All certificates contained the explicit notice that they were issued without a physical examination, because a physical examination was not necessary to establish the grounds for exemption. All certificates were moreover only provisional and stated that they had to be confirmed by a public health officer within six months. The certificates were in line with my medical conviction and the Declaration of Geneva.
All statements that the university classified as “unscientific” and held against me as grounds for dismissal were supported by publicly available epidemiological figures and studies. No breach of the university’s COVID regulations took place, nor could any be established in the labour-court proceedings.
Do not give up in these crazy times. I would not do anything differently. Freedom of therapy, patient autonomy, the rule of law and freedom must be restored. I am deeply disappointed by the majority of the medical profession – sometimes I am ashamed to be a doctor.
The information in this case report comes from the affected person themselves. The editorial team verifies whether a criminal or professional prosecution has taken place; it cannot verify the factual accuracy of every single statement. Responsibility for the correctness of the account lies with the respective author.
Case #0005
Accusation: Participation in demonstrations and violations of COVID measures as a private individual
Case #0033
Accusation: Supervisory disciplinary action by the Zürich Cantonal Health Office over vaccine- and Corona-critical content on the…
Case #0003
Accusation: Issuing 16 mask exemption certificates allegedly without personal examination