The Hippocratic Oath and the Declaration of Geneva are the highest foundations of my medical practice.
In my layman’s legal understanding, based on anamnestic information (prima facie evidence, as required by the BayIfSMV (Bavarian Infection Protection Measures Ordinance) until 29 November 2020) and my years of daily experience with masks as an anesthesiologist, I issued exemption certificates to the best of my knowledge and conscience, in some cases even before a personal examination.Until 2020, there was a relevant difference for me between a medical certificate and a health certificate. To this day, I am not aware of any law or regulation that fundamentally requires me to carry out a physical examination before issuing a medical certificate. Nor does the code of professional conduct require this. Moreover, the medical history is the first step of any examination and is therefore a fundamental part of the examination.
On 13 May 2026 at 11:00 a.m., main hearing of the appeals before the 6th Criminal Senate of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) in Leipzig against the judgment of 20 March 2024 at the Nuremberg-Fürth Regional Court.
First of all, I hope that the judges at the BGH will act in accordance with the Oath of Office for Judges set out in § 38 of the German Judiciary Act (DRiG) and “serve truth and justice alone”. I hope that in the near future a ruthlessly honest reckoning with the entire matter will become possible and that those actually responsible will be held to account.
I wish for doctors to be rehabilitated in this context.
For the future, I wish for a human family guided by values, morals, righteousness, incorruptibility, reliability, strength of character, integrity and humanity.
The information in this case report comes from the affected person themselves. The editorial team verifies whether a criminal or professional prosecution has taken place; it cannot verify the factual accuracy of every single statement. Responsibility for the correctness of the account lies with the respective author.
Case #0027
Accusation: 57 mask exemption certificates – 1 year 10 months suspended sentence, confirmed by the Federal Court of Justice; cons…
Case #0010
Accusation: Issuance of 38 mask exemption certificates, public criticism of face coverings
Case #0012
Accusation: Issuing false medical certificates (mask exemptions), not wearing a mask during a demonstration